Solutions for Stablecoin Issuers
A missed check becomes a fine. Block it before the block is mined.
AuditKey screens every transfer in the mempool, checks counterparties against sanctions lists and KYC registries in real time, and drafts localized SARs in minutes. Designed for the compliance obligations GENIUS Act and MiCA impose on issuers today.
Risk scores, entity labels, and counterparty exposure across chains, with a visual graph explorer.
The compliance gaps issuers face today
What compliance looks like for issuers right now.
You are liable before the transaction settles.
GENIUS and MiCA require issuer-side screening. Sanctioned counterparties are your exposure.
Your current tooling reads logs that do not exist on privacy networks.
Volume is moving to shielded networks. Legacy forensic tools cannot read transactions there after settlement.
Filing a SAR takes days. An exploit settles in under a second.
SAR drafting still relies on manual investigation. Detection-to-filing delay is your exposure window.

Real-time compliance, from mempool to SAR.
Four capabilities that address the issuer compliance stack end to end.
Mempool Screening
AuditKey intercepts transfers in the mempool before they confirm. Every counterparty is checked against OFAC and international sanctions lists and your KYC registry in real time. Flagged transactions are held or blocked before they settle, not investigated after.
Why post-finality tools cannot solve this.
Legacy compliance tools were built for the blockchain forensics era: read event logs, trace transaction history, flag addresses after settlement. That model works when all transactions are public and speed does not matter. Neither condition holds for stablecoin issuers in 2025 onward.
GENIUS Act and MiCA require controls at the point of transfer, not retrospective reporting. Pre-finality screening is not a feature addition to a forensic tool. It requires a different data architecture, a different position in the transaction lifecycle, and a different agent model. Rebuilding a forensic dashboard into a pre-finality engine breaks the product and the revenue model that built it. Incumbents face that tradeoff. AuditKey does not.
On zero-knowledge networks, the problem is not speed, it is existence. There is no public log to read. A forensic tool that cannot see the transaction cannot screen it. AuditKey's Proof of Innocence mechanism is the only currently viable path to compliance on shielded networks that does not require forcing users off privacy networks entirely.
Why teams trust AuditKey
Why compliance teams trust AuditKey.
DTCC AI Hackathon.
AuditKey's prototype won the DTCC AI Hackathon, the financial infrastructure industry's primary applied AI competition. The winning submission demonstrated real-time compliance screening at institutional scale.
What they say.
Working with compliance and product teams across the United States, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Latin America.
“AuditKey seamlessly monitors our stablecoin transactions in real time and automatically generates jurisdiction-aware SAR drafts the moment a risk is flagged, transforming our compliance pipeline by cutting manual investigation times from days to minutes.”
Victor Cioff, Nora StablecoinScreen your first address today.
Create a free account and run a check in minutes. No sales call, no credit card.
Free tier included. Upgrade when you are ready for production volume.
Questions stablecoin compliance teams ask us.
Straight answers on issuer obligations, screening, and SAR drafting.
Does AuditKey screen before or after a transaction confirms?
AuditKey screens in the mempool, before block finality. Counterparties are checked against sanctions lists and KYC registries in real time, so a flagged transfer is held or blocked before it settles.
How does AuditKey handle transfers from zero-knowledge privacy networks?
When a transfer originates from a shielded network, AuditKey triggers a Proof of Innocence request. The sender submits a view key or zero-knowledge proof. AuditKey verifies the funds are clean without accessing the full transaction history. The transfer either clears or is blocked, and the compliance record is maintained.
Does AuditKey integrate with our existing KYC registry?
AuditKey is built for integration via API. Confirm your specific registry and chain requirements with our team during onboarding.
Which sanctions lists does AuditKey screen against?
Confirm the current sanctions list coverage in the product documentation or with the team. As an issuer, confirm that coverage matches your regulatory obligations for each jurisdiction you operate in.
Does AuditKey support GENIUS Act compliance?
AuditKey provides real-time pre-finality screening, KYC counterparty checks, audit trails, and automated SAR drafting, which map to the core AML program obligations GENIUS Act imposes on issuers. Confirm your specific obligations with legal counsel.
Does AuditKey support MiCA compliance?
AuditKey's transaction monitoring, reporting, and VASP screening capabilities are designed for MiCA obligations for e-money token and asset-referenced token issuers. Confirm your specific requirements with legal counsel.
Does AuditKey support compliance with Brazil's Marco Legal dos Criptoativos?
AuditKey provides real-time pre-finality screening, KYC counterparty checks, audit trails, and automated COS drafting aligned with AML and monitoring obligations under Brazil's Marco Legal dos Criptoativos and Central Bank rules. Confirm your specific obligations with legal counsel.
Can AuditKey draft a SAR automatically?
Yes. The AI investigator analyzes a flagged address with jurisdiction-aware context and outputs a localized SAR draft. Your analyst reviews and files rather than building the report from scratch.
Can AuditKey help us build compliance into our stablecoin at issuance, not just screen transfers after launch?
Yes. Compliant Privacy Pool Issuance helps issuers implement a privacy-preserving token or pool with Governed Disclosure embedded at the contract level, so compliance is part of the asset from issuance rather than a separate screening layer added afterward. Available as a self-serve integration or as guided implementation with AuditKey's team. Confirm scope and timeline with the team during onboarding.
What is the difference between SAR, COS, and STR?
The difference lies in geographic territory, local legislation, and the receiving agencies for each financial crime report. In the United States, the SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is regulated by the Bank Secrecy Act and submitted directly to FinCEN. In Brazil, the COS (Comunicação de Operação Suspeita) is governed by Law No. 9.613/1998 alongside Central Bank monitoring rules and is filed with COAF. In Europe, the STR (Suspicious Transaction Report) complies with the European Union's anti-money laundering rules (AMLR) and MiCA, and is forwarded to local Financial Intelligence Units under the AMLA agency. AuditKey includes native skills trained for the technical, legal, and data requirements of each acronym, ensuring automated, preventive compliance.
Is there a free tier for stablecoin issuers?
Yes. You can create a free account and screen addresses with no credit card required. Production-volume screening and full case management are available on paid tiers.
